View Single Post
Old 08-26-2004, 08:10 AM   #9 (permalink)
James C. Reeves
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Cadillac SRX Review

"Levi Ramsey" <levi@cygnetnet.net> wrote in message
newsan.2004.03.20.02.10.24.420840@cygnetnet.net. ..
| On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:15:19 -0500, James C. Reeves wrote:
| I see quite a few on the road in Western Massachusetts,
| which is not traditional Cadillac territory.

Glad they're moving somewhere.

| SRX has been a slow seller for the same reason that the Chrysler Pacifica
| has been: the early production runs were too high-priced for their own
| good. The high-50K SRX (with the Northstar) gets slaughtered by both the
| other car-based SUV/wagons and the Escalade in that segment. The 40K SRX
| (with the 3.6) kicks the ass of everything in that range.

I see quite a few a more Pacificas...at least around here.

| Cadillac is earning a lot of kudos from car design buffs for not trying to
| copy BMW (which is exactly what every other luxury make is doing now,
| though whether they'll follow BMW into Pontiac-clone territory is
| debatable).

Car design buffs are in the same category a movie critics as far as I'm
concerned. Too often what they like, most everyone else seems to dislike and
vise-versa. But, sometimes they hit it right! :-)



  Reply With Quote